These
are the photos of my 14 months old son, who was showing me a lump of mud and he
seems to be saying -Try this, see how tasty it is. What do you think he is
trying to say?
There
was a sweet pastime that took place when Lord Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (Nimai) was
a small boy.Once Mother Sachi gave a bowl of Fused rice, sweetmeats to little
Nimai to eat and went on to do some household work.Then, Nimai hid himself and
started eating dirt. Seeing this, mother Saci hastily returned and exclaimed,
"What is this! What is this?" She snatched the dirt from the hands of
the Lord and inquired why He was eating it.
Crying,
the child inquired from His mother, "Why are you angry? You have already
given me dirt to eat. What is My fault?. "Fused rice, sweetmeats and all
other eatables are but transformations of dirt. This is dirt that is dirt.
Please consider. What is the difference between them? This body is a transformation
of dirt, and the eatables are also a transformation of dirt. Please reflect
upon this. You are blaming me without consideration. What can I say?"
This
is an explanation of the Mayavada philosophy, which takes everything to be one.
The necessities of the body, namely eating, sleeping, mating and defending, are
all unnecessary in spiritual life. When one is elevated to the spiritual
platform, there are no more bodily necessities, and in activities pertaining to
the bodily necessities there are no spiritual considerations. In other words,
the more we eat, sleep, have sex and try to defend ourselves, the more we
engage in material activities. Unfortunately, Mayavadi philosophers consider
devotional activities to be bodily activities. They cannot understand the
simple explanation in the Bhagavad-gita (14.26):
mam
ca yo 'vyabhicarena bhakti-yogena sevate
sa
gunan samatityaitan brahma-bhuyaya kalpate
"Anyone
who engages in spiritual devotional service without motivation, rendering such
service for the satisfaction of the Lord, is elevated immediately to the
spiritual platform, and all his activities are spiritual." Brahma-bhuyaya
refers to Brahman (spiritual) activities. Although Mayavadi philosophers are
very eager to merge into the Brahman effulgence, they have no Brahman
activities. To a certain extent they recommend Brahman activities, which for
them means engagement in studying the Vedanta and Sankhya philosophies, but
their interpretations are but dry speculation. Lacking the varieties of
spiritual activity, they cannot stay for long on that platform of simply
studying Vedanta or Sankhya philosophy.
Life
is meant for varieties of enjoyment. The living entity is by nature full of an
enjoying spirit, as stated in the Vedanta-sutra (1.1.12): ananda-mayo 'bhyasat.
In devotional service the activities are variegated and full of enjoyment. As
stated in the Bhagavad-gita (9.2), all devotional activities are easy to
perform (su-sukham kartum) and are eternal and spiritual (avyayam). Since
Mayavadi philosophers cannot understand this, they take it for granted that a
devotee's activities (sravanam kirtanam vishnoh smaranam pada-sevanam, etc. [SB
7.5.23]) are all material and are therefore maya. They also consider Krishna's
advent in this universe and His activities to be maya. Therefore, because they
consider everything maya, they are known as Mayavadis.
Actually,
any activities performed favorably for the satisfaction of the Lord, under the
direction of the spiritual master, are spiritual. But for a person to disregard
the order of the spiritual master and act by concoction, accepting his
nonsensical activities to be spiritual, is maya. One must achieve the favor of
the Supreme Personality of Godhead through the mercy of the spiritual master.
Therefore one must first please the spiritual master, and if he is pleased,
then we should understand that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is also
pleased. But if the spiritual master is displeased by our actions, they are not
spiritual. Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura confirms this: yasya prasadad
bhagavat-prasado yasyaprasadan na gatih kuto 'pi **. Activities that please the
spiritual master must be considered spiritual, and they should be accepted as
satisfying to the Lord.
Lord
Caitanya Mahaprabhu, as the supreme spiritual master, instructed His mother
about the Mayavada philosophy. By saying that the body is dirt and eatables are
also dirt, He implied that everything is maya. This is Mayavada philosophy. The
philosophy of the Mayavadis is defective because it maintains that everything
is maya but the nonsense they speak. While saying that everything is maya, the
Mayavadi philosopher loses the opportunity of devotional service, and therefore
his life is doomed. Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu therefore advised mayavadi-bhashya
sunile haya sarva-nasa (Cc. Madhya 6.169). If one accepts the Mayavada
philosophy, his advancement is doomed forever.
Astonished
that the child was speaking Mayavada philosophy, mother Saci replied, "Who
has taught You this philosophical speculation that justifies eating
dirt?". Replying to the Mayavada idea of the child philosopher, mother
Saci said, "My dear boy, if we eat earth transformed into grain, our body
is nourished, and it becomes strong. But if we eat dirt in its crude state, the
body becomes diseased instead of nourished, and thus it is destroyed.
In
the philosophical discourse between the mother and the son, when the son said
that everything is one, as impersonalists say, the mother replied, "If
everything is one, why do people in general not eat dirt but eat the food
grains produced from the dirt?"
In
a waterpot, which is a transformation of dirt, I can bring water very easily.
But if I poured water on a lump of dirt, the lump would soak up the water, and
my labor would be useless."
This
simple philosophy propounded by Sacimata, can defeat the Mayavadi philosophers
who speculate on oneness. The defect of Mayavada philosophy is that it does not
accept the variety that is useful for practical purposes. Sacimata gave the
example that although an earthen pot and a lump of dirt are basically one, for
practical purposes the waterpot is useful whereas the lump of dirt is useless.
Sometimes scientists argue that matter and spirit are one, with no difference
between them. Factually, in a higher sense, there is no difference between
matter and spirit, but one should have the practical knowledge that matter,
being an inferior state of existence, is useless for our spiritual, blissful
life, whereas spirit, being a finer state, is full of bliss. In this connection
the Bhagavatam gives the example that dirt and fire are practically one and the
same. From the earth grow trees, and from their wood come fire and smoke.
Nevertheless, for heat we can utilize the fire but not the earth, smoke or
wood. Therefore, for the ultimate realization of the goal of life, we are
concerned with the fire of the spirit, not the dull wood or earth of matter.
The
Lord replied to His mother, "Why did you conceal self-realization by not
teaching me this practical philosophy in the beginning? Now that I can
understand this philosophy, no more shall I eat dirt.
If
from the beginning of life one is taught the Vaishnava philosophy of duality or
variety, the monistic philosophy will not bother him very much. In reality,
everything is an emanation from the supreme source (janmady asya yatah [SB
1.1.1]). The original energy is exhibited in varieties, exactly as the
sunshine, the original energy emanating from the sun, exhibits itself in
variety as light and heat. One cannot say that light is heat or that heat is
light, yet one cannot separate one from the other. Therefore Lord Caitanya
Mahaprabhu's philosophy is acintya-bhedabheda, inconceivable non-separation and
distinction. Although there is an affinity between the two physical
manifestations light and heat, there is also a difference between them.
Similarly, although the whole cosmic manifestation is the Lord's energy, the
energy is nevertheless exhibited in varieties of manifestations.
(Nimai
eating dirt excerpted from Sri Caitanya Caritamrta Adi-lila Chapter 14 by Srila
Prabhupad )